The Tax PublishersITA No. 776/Ind/2019
2020 TaxPub(DT) 3483 (Ind-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 37(1)

Education cess is not a tax and is an expenditure under section 37(1) which can be claimed against the profits and gains of the business carried out by the assessee, therefore as decided in assessee's own case for the assessment years 2012-13 to 2014-15, issue was decided in favour of the assessee by allowing the claim of education cess to be allowed as an expenditure.

Business expenditure - Deduction of education cess - Education cess is not a tax and is an expenditure - Allowability

Assessee was engaged in business of coal trading and operated in most of the States of India. It procured coal from various sources, i.e., from Indian collieries, purchase from local market and also import coal from different countries. During the course of assessment proceedings, assessee filed written submissions providing information called for by AO. Assessee made a fresh claim of deduction of Education Cess before AO which was not accepted by AO. Assessment under section 143(3) was completed making additions/disallowances. Held: High Court in the case of Chambal Fertilisers & Chemicals Ltd. v. Jt.CIT [ITA. No.52/2018, dated 31-7-2018] found that the facts of the case were identical to the facts of the case in appeal and held that education cess is not a tax and thus is an expenditure under section 37 which cannot be claimed against the profits and gains of business carried out by the assessee. Similar issue stands adjudicated in assessee's own case for the assessment years 2012-13 to 2014-15 wherein issue was decided in favour of the assessee by allowing the claim of education cess to be allowed as an expenditure.

Followed:Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited v. Dy. CIT & Anr. (2017) 247 Taxman 361 (SC) : 2017 TaxPub(DT) 968 (SC), Dy. CIT v. Agrawal Coal Corporation Pvt. Ltd. [ITA Nos. 801 to 803/Ind/2018, ITA Nos. 778/Ind/2018 & C.O.No.23 & 24/Ind/2019, dt. 28-11-2019], Asstt. CIT v. Agrawal Coal Corporation Private Limited & Vice-Versa [ITA. Nos. 202 & 294/Ind/2012, C.O.No.63/Ind/2012 [Arising out of ITA.No. 202/Ind/2012), ITA.Nos. 389/Ind/2012, 807 & 808/Ind/2014, dt. 27-6-2016], CIT v. Mahalaxmi Sugar Mills Company Limited (1986) 58 CTR 0138 (SC) : 1986 TaxPub(DT) 1659 (SC), CIT v. Pruthvi Brokers & Shareholders Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 349 ITR 0336 (Bom) : 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2671 (Bom-HC) and CIT v. Ramco International (2011) 332 ITR 306 (P&H) : 2011 TaxPub(DT) 19 (P&H-HC). Relied:CIT v. Walfort Share & Stock Brokers P. Ltd. 2010 TaxPub(DT) 2087 (SC), Instalment Supply (Pvt.) Ltd. & Anr. v. UOI & Ors. (1961) 12 STC 489 (SC), Chambal Fertilisers & Chemicals Ltd. v. Jt.CIT [ITA No.52/2018, dated 31-7-2018, and Instalment Supply Limited v. State of Delhi & Ors. (1956) 7 STC 586 (Pun).

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. : 2016-17



IN THE ITAT, INDORE BENCH

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT

TaxPublishers.in

'Kedarnath', 7, Avadh Vihar, Near Nirali Dhani,

Chopasni Road

Jodhpur - 342 008 (Rajasthan) INDIA

Phones : 9785602619 (11 am - 5 pm)

E-Mail : mail@taxpublishers.in / mail.taxpublishers@gmail.com