Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. 2019 TaxPub(DT) 4931 (SC)
REFERRED ACIT v. Tata Sons Ltd. 2019 TaxPub(DT) 1891 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 4371 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Tata Sons Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2016 TaxPub(DT) 5055 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Harvinder Singh Jaggi v. Asstt. CIT 2016 TaxPub(DT) 1288 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Mega Corporation Ltd. v. Addl. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 4298 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED City Garden v. ITO 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2734 (Jod-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Pruthvi Brokers & Shareholders Pvt. Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2671 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Ghanshyam K. Khabrani v. Asstt. CIT 2012 TaxPub(DT) 1843 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. SPLs Siddhartha Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 1806 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Valvoline Cummins Ltd. V. DY. CIT & ORS. 2008 TaxPub(DT) 2033 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Bindal Apparels Ltd. v. Assistant CIT 2006 TaxPub(DT) 1545 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Microfin Securities (P) Ltd. v. Additional CIT 2005 TaxPub(DT) 1513 (Luck-Trib)
REFERRED Dr. Nalini Mahajan & Ors. v. Director of Income-tax (Inv.) & Ors. 2002 TaxPub(DT) 1380 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Berger Paints India Ltd. & Ors. v. Assistant CIT & Ors. 2000 TaxPub(DT) 1328 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT 1998 TaxPub(DT) 0342 (SC)
REFERRED Ashok Vardhan Birla v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax 1994 TaxPub(DT) 0138 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Inaroo Ltd. v. CIT 1993 TaxPub(DT) 1163 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. v. CIT 1993 TaxPub(DT) 0430 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Inventors Industrial Corporation Ltd. v. CIT 1992 TaxPub(DT) 0461 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Jute Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT & Anr. 1991 TaxPub(DT) 0505 (SC)
REFERRED CIT v. Govindram Brothers (P) Ltd. 1983 TaxPub(DT) 0441 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED P.V. Doshi v. CIT 1978 TaxPub(DT) 0606 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. S. Nelliappan 1967 TaxPub(DT) 0368 (SC)
 
The Tax Publishers2019 TaxPub(DT) 6792 (Mum-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 143(3)

Assessment orders framed after amalgamation in the name of non-existent company was bad in law and was, therefore, set aside.

Assessment - Validity - Order passed after amalgamation in the name of non-existent company - AO being aware of the fact of amalgamation

AO framed assessment for the concerned assessment year 1999-2000 in the name of M/s. Sabras Investment and Trading Company Ltd. despite being very much aware of the fact that said company has merged with Tata Chemicals Ltd. with effect from 1-4-2000. Held: Assessment orders framed after amalgamation in the name of non-existent company was bad in law and was, therefore, set aside.

Followed:Pr. CIT v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. (SC) in Civil Appeal No. 5409 of 2019 vide order dt. 25-7-2019] : 2019 TaxPub(DT) 4931 (SC).

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. : 1996-97 to 1999-2000


INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 120(4)(b) Section 143(3) Section 2(7A)

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT