Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED NetHawk Networks India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO 2019 TaxPub(DT) 4712 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Chrys Capital Investment Advisors (I) (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 2181 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CISCO Systems (India) (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 0273 (Bang-Trib)
REFERRED Techbooks International (P) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2014 TaxPub(DT) 3905 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Westfalia Separator India (P) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2014 TaxPub(DT) 3001 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Willis Processing Services India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2014 TaxPub(DT) 1046 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Premier Exploration Services (P.) Ltd. v. ITO 2014 TaxPub(DT) 0795 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Agnity India Technologies (P.) Ltd. 2013 TaxPub(DT) 2693 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Rusabh Diamonds v. Asstt. CIT 2013 TaxPub(DT) 1896 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Willis Processing Services (I) (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2013 TaxPub(DT) 1369 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Global Logic India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2013 TaxPub(DT) 0996 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Trilogy E-Business Software v. Dy. CIT 2013 TaxPub(DT) 0580 (Bang-Trib)
REFERRED Four Soft Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2534 (Hyd-Trib)
REFERRED Sapient Corporation (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2252 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Sitel Operating Corporation India Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 0338 (Karn-HC)
REFERRED Dy. CIT v. BP India Services (P) Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 0285 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. 2011 TaxPub(DT) 1960 (Karn-HC)
REFERRED SAP Labs India (P) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2011 TaxPub(DT) 0438 (Bang-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd. 2011 TaxPub(DT) 0314 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Dy. CIT v. Quark Systems (P) Ltd. 2010 TaxPub(DT) 0907 (Chd-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Enron Expat Services Inc. 2010 TaxPub(DT) 0811 (Uttarakhand-HC)
REFERRED Livingstones Jewellery (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2009 TaxPub(DT) 1729 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Woodward Governor India P. Ltd. 2009 TaxPub(DT) 1628 (SC)
REFERRED ITO v. Sak Soft Ltd. 2009 TaxPub(DT) 1533 (Chen-Trib)
REFERRED ITO v. Banyan Chemicals Ltd. 2009 TaxPub(DT) 1233 (Adh-Trib)
REFERRED Sony India (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2009 TaxPub(DT) 0886 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Patni Telecom (P) Ltd. v. ITO 2009 TaxPub(DT) 0258 (Hyd-Trib)
REFERRED ITO v. Servion Global Solutions Ltd. 2009 TaxPub(DT) 0082 (Chen-Trib)
REFERRED Dy. CIT v. Softsol India Ltd. 2008 TaxPub(DT) 1652 (Hyd-Trib)
REFERRED Chancepond Technologies (P) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2008 TaxPub(DT) 1651 (Chen-Trib)
REFERRED Tata Elxsi Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2008 TaxPub(DT) 1143 (Bang-Trib)
REFERRED Gate Global Solutions Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2007 TaxPub(DT) 1555 (Bang-Trib)
REFERRED Dy. CIT v. Binary Semantics Ltd. 2007 TaxPub(DT) 1125 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Renaissance Jewellery (P) Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer 2006 TaxPub(DT) 0480 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Priyanka Gems v. Assistant CIT 2005 TaxPub(DT) 1121 (Ahd-Trib)
REFERRED Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT 2003 TaxPub(DT) 0372 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Deutsche Bank A.G. v. Deputy CIT 2003 TaxPub(DT) 0277 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Smt. Sujata Grover v. Deputy CIT 2002 TaxPub(DT) 0865 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT 1998 TaxPub(DT) 0342 (SC)
REFERRED CIT v. Martin & Harris P. Ltd. 1985 TaxPub(DT) 1178 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Oil India Ltd. 1983 TaxPub(DT) 0643 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED Bestobell (India) Ltd. v. CIT 1979 TaxPub(DT) 0769 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED Khandelwal Brothers (P) Ltd. v. CIT 1979 TaxPub(DT) 0533 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Bharat General Reinsurance Co. Ltd. 1971 TaxPub(DT) 0294 (Del-HC)
REFERRED R.B. Jessaram Fatehchand v. CIT 1971 TaxPub(DT) 0224 (All-HC)
REFERRED Pt. Sheo Nath Prasad Sharma v. CIT 1967 TaxPub(DT) 0308 (All-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. V. Mr. P. Firm 1965 TaxPub(DT) 0204 (SC)
REFERRED CIT v. C. Parakh & Co. (India) Ltd. 1956 TaxPub(DT) 0141 (SC)
 
The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 0015 (Mum-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 92C

If contention of assessee, that related party transactions (RPT) of 3DPLM was more than 25% was found to be correct, 3DPLM Software Solutions Ltd. would be excluded from final set of comparables.

Transfer pricing - Determination of ALP - Selection of comparables - Assessee pleading failure of 25% RPT filter applied by TPO

Assessee rendered software development services to AE abroad. TPO considered 3DPLM Software Solutions Ltd. as comparable to assessee's case. Assessee challneged this on the ground that related party transactions (RPT) of 3DPLM were more than 25% and it did not satisfy the filter applied by TPO. Held: Matter remanded. TPO was directed to verify related party transactions of 3DPLM and if contention of assessee, that RPT of 3DPLM was more than 25% was found to be correct, 3DPLM Software Solutions Ltd. would be excluded from final set of comparables.

Relied:Global Logic India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT ITA. No. 5110 (Del) of 2010 : 2013 TaxPub(DT) 996 (Del-Trib).

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : Matter remanded.

A.Y. : 2009-10 & 2010-11


INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 92C

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT

OR Try Reload the Page