The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 1226 (Agra-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 2(1A)

Where agricultural income regularly shown by assessee in earlier years was accepted by Revenue, the same would be considered in the year under consideration also. Therefore, considering the past history and also certificate issued by the Horticulture Department, addition of Rs. 32,68,500 made by AO by disallowing the agricultural income was required to be partly deleted and accordingly, the agriculture income upto Rs. 22,68,500 was accepted and the addition of Rs. 10 lakhs was sustained.

Agricultural income - Assessee produced document showing agricultural land - Revenue alleged assessee not having any machinery equipment and other resources required for cultivation of land -

AO treated agricultural income shown by assessee as 'income from other sources' and made an addition of Rs. 32,68,500 on that account. AO alleged that the assessee did not have any machinery equipment and other resources, which were required and essential for cultivation of land. He further alleged that the assessee did not furnish any proof of carrying out agricultural activities by way of purchase of seeds, fertilizers, labour payment etc., and having any kind of agricultural equipment or machinery to cultivate such vast piece of land as claimed. Further, the CIT (A) confirmed the said addition as made by the AO. Held: Assessee produced document showing the agricultural land to the extent of 25.946 hectares. Further, considering past history of the case and facts of the case in the year under consideration, it was fully proved and established that the assessee was engaged in agricultural operations. Thus, the CIT (Appeals) erred in confirming the finding of the AO that the assessee was not engaged in large-scale agricultural operation. Further, as the agricultural income regularly shown by the assessee in earlier years was accepted, the same would be considered in the year under consideration also. Therefore, considering the past history and also the certificate issued by the Horticulture Department, the agriculture income upto Rs. 22,68,500 was accepted and the addition of Rs. 10 lakhs was sustained.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : Partly in favour of assessee

A.Y. : 2014-15



IN THE ITAT, AGRA BENCH

LALIET KUMAR, J.M. & DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, A.M.

Arvind Gautam v. ITO

ITA No. 290/Agra/2018

A.Y. 2014-15

8 January, 2020

In favour of Assessee.

Appellant by: Pankaj Gargh , AR

Respondent by: Waseem Arshad, Sr. DR

ORDER

Laliet Kumar, J.M.

This appeal of assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner (Appeals)-2, Agra, for the assessment year 2014-15.

2. Brief facts of the case are that, the assessee, an individual, e-filed her return of income for the year under consideration on 15-10-2014, declaring a total income of Rs. 3,84,150. As in the earlier assessment year, assessing officer treated the part of agricultural income shown by the assessee as income from other sources and made an addition of Rs. 32,68,500 on this account and total income was assessed at Rs. 36,52,650.

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT