|
The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 3165 (Mum-Trib)IN THE ITAT, MUMBAI BENCH
RAJESH KUMAR, A.M. & AMARJIT SINGH, J.M.
ITO v. Heckyl Technologies (P) Ltd.
ITA No. 3087/Mum/2017, Cross Objection No. 270/Mum/2018 (Arising out of ITA No. 3087/Mum/2017)
23 July, 2020
In favour of assessee.
Assessee by: Piyus Chhajjed
Revenue by: R. Bhupathi
Rajesh Kumar, A.M.
The Revenue by way of this appeal and assessee by way of cross objection are challenging the order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals)-13 hereinafter called (Commissioner (Appeals)), Mumbai, in Appeal No. Commissioner (Appeals)-13/DCIT-7(1)(3)/923/2015-16, dated 6-2-2017. The assessment for impugned assessment year was framed by learned Income Tax Officer-7(1)(3), Mumbai (AO) under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 10-11-2015. First we will take the Revenue appeal. The revenue has raised the following grounds in its appeal.
SUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT |