Chrochemie Laboratory (P) Ltd., In re

SUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT


The Tax Publishers 2019 TaxPub(GST) 1159 (AAR-Karn) : (2020) 091 ITPJ (G) 0677 IN THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KARNATAKA HARISH DHARNIA & DR. RAVI PRASAD M.P. MEMBER (STATE TAX) Chrochemie Laboratory (P) Ltd., In re Advance Ruling No. KAR-ADRG-71/2019 23 September, 2019 Represented by : G. Shivadass, Advocate ORDER Order Under Section 98(4) of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and Under 98(4) of the Karnataka Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 M/s Chromachemie Laboratory Private Limited, (called applicant hereinafter), having GSTIN number 29AAFCC0285K1ZF, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 & KGST Rules, 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01, discharging the fee of Rs. 5,000 each under the CGST Act and the KGST Act. 2. The Applicant is a private limited company and is registered under the Goods and Services Act, 2017. The applicant has sought advance ruling in respect of the following question: SUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT

The Tax Publishers 2019 TaxPub(GST) 1159 (AAR-Karn) : (2020) 091 ITPJ (G) 0677

IN THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KARNATAKA

HARISH DHARNIA & DR. RAVI PRASAD M.P. MEMBER (STATE TAX)

Chrochemie Laboratory (P) Ltd., In re

Advance Ruling No. KAR-ADRG-71/2019

23 September, 2019

Represented by : G. Shivadass, Advocate

ORDER

Order Under Section 98(4) of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and Under 98(4) of the Karnataka Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017

M/s Chromachemie Laboratory Private Limited, (called applicant hereinafter), having GSTIN number 29AAFCC0285K1ZF, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 & KGST Rules, 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01, discharging the fee of Rs. 5,000 each under the CGST Act and the KGST Act.

2. The Applicant is a private limited company and is registered under the Goods and Services Act, 2017. The applicant has sought advance ruling in respect of the following question: