Arbitration--Anti-Suit Injunctions in International Arbitration
Judicial Perspectives on Anti-Suit Injunctions in Foreign-Seated Arbitrations : Lessons from UK Courts
CS. Raksha Sankhlecha
This article examines the evolving role of anti-suit injunctions in international arbitration, highlighting the UK Supreme Court's pro-arbitration approach and its implications for global jurisprudence, including Indian legal perspectives.
1. Introduction
On 18-9-2024, the UK Supreme Court (UKSC) delivered a decisive ruling on an anti-suit injunction (ASI) in a Paris-seated ICC arbitration. The case exemplifies how ASIs serve to uphold arbitration agreements, rather than hinder them.
2. Background of the Case
The dispute arose between RusChemAlliance (RCA), a Russian-incorporated entity, and UniCredit, a German bank with assets in Russia. In 2021, UniCredit issued bonds worth EUR 420 million to RCA for a gas processing plant project undertaken with a third-party contractor. While the bond agreement stipulated that English law would govern all contractual and non-contractual obligations, arbitration proceedings were designated to the ICC with a Paris seat.