Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED Yogendrakumar Gupta v. ITO 2018 TaxPub(DT) 3217 (SC)
REFERRED Asstt. CIT v. Resham Petrotech Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2154 (Ahd-Trib)
REFERRED Sound Casting (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT & Ors. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2129 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Pyramid Software & Technologies v. Dy CIT 2008 TaxPub(DT) 0248 (Asr-Trib)
REFERRED Jashan Textile Mills (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT & Ors. 2006 TaxPub(DT) 1450 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED German Remedies Ltd. v. Deputy CIT 2006 TaxPub(DT) 0885 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Dass Friends Builders (P) Ltd. v. Deputy CIT 2006 TaxPub(DT) 0629 (All-HC)
REFERRED Assistant CIT v. Star Ferro Alloys (P) Ltd. 2004 TaxPub(DT) 1650 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Berger Paints India Ltd. v. Assistant CIT & Ors. 2004 TaxPub(DT) 1228 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED Bawa Abhai Singh v. Deputy CIT 2002 TaxPub(DT) 0311 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. R.Y. Durlabhji 1995 TaxPub(DT) 0122 (Raj-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Agarwalla Bros. 1991 TaxPub(DT) 0446 (Pat-HC)
REFERRED United Patel Construction Co. v. CIT 1966 TaxPub(DT) 0127 (MP-HC)
REFERRED Raj Mohan Saha & Ors. v. CIT 1964 TaxPub(DT) 0020 (Assam-HC)
REFERRED Gopi Nath Agarwal v. CIT 1955 TaxPub(DT) 0158 (All-HC)
REFERRED Dhakeswari Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT 1954 TaxPub(DT) 0123 (SC)
REFERRED Seth Nathuram Munnalal v. CIT 1954 TaxPub(DT) 0007 (Nag-HC)
REFERRED Banshidhar Onkarmall v. CIT 1953 TaxPub(DT) 0005 (Ori-HC)
REFERRED Narayan Chandra Baidya v. CIT 1951 TaxPub(DT) 0116 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED Ram Datta Sita Ram of Basti, In Re v. 1947 TaxPub(DT) 0023 (All-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Gokaldas Hukumchand 1943 TaxPub(DT) 0041 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Maharajadhiraja Kameshwar Singh of Darbhanga 1933 TaxPub(DT) 0025 (Privy Council)
 
The Tax Publishers2019 TaxPub(DT) 0789 (Mum-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 68

Since assessee had filed sufficient evidences to prove identity and creditworthiness of share application and genuineness of transaction of receipt of share application money share application money could not be treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68.

Income from undisclosed sources - Addition under section 68 - Receipt of share application money -

AO received information from investigation wing as to assessee having received share application money from alleged entry operator. Therefore, AO treated share application money received by the assessee as unexplained cash credit and accordingly made addition under section 68.Held: Assessee had filed details of share applicants inter alia name and addresses of share applicants; PAN and income-tax return acknowledgements of share applicants, copies of audited balance sheet and profit and loss account of share applicants and details of investment made by them inter alia, cheque No. and date of cheque, and the bank on which said cheques were drawn. Also, assessee filed copy of bank statement of the assessee of banking account in which account payee cheques received from share applicants were deposited and credited to its acocunt and copies of share allotment and share certificate issued by the assessee. Thus, assessee had duly discharged onus cast on it to prove identity and creditworthiness of share application and genuineness of transaction of receipt of share application money. Accordingly, no addition could be made under section 68.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. : 2008-09 & 2007-08



IN THE ITAT, MUMBAI BENCH

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT

TaxPublishers.in

'Kedarnath', 7, Avadh Vihar, Near Nirali Dhani,

Chopasni Road

Jodhpur - 342 008 (Rajasthan) INDIA

Phones : 9785602619 (11 am - 5 pm)

E-Mail : mail@taxpublishers.in / mail.taxpublishers@gmail.com