|
The Tax Publishers2019 TaxPub(DT) 4482 (Del-Trib) INCOME TAX ACT, 1961
Section 14A
Where assessee had not claimed any exempt income during relevant assessment year, disallowance under section 14A was not warranted because in the absence of any tax-free income the corresponding expenditure could not be taken into consideration for disallowance.
|
Disallowance under section 14A - Expenditure against exempt income - No exempt dividend income claimed by assessee -
Assessee earned exempt dividend income during the relevant assessment year. AO made addition under section 14A, which was deleted by CIT(A) because during the said assessment year, assessee had not claimed any exempt income. Held: The fact that assessee had not claimed any exempt income during the relevant assessment year was accepted by revenue. If for the relevant assessment year, the assessee did not earn any tax-free income, the corresponding expenditure incurred could not be taken into consideration for disallowance. Thus, disallowance made by AO was not sustainable
Followed:Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT (2015) 61 Taxmann.com 118 (Delhi) : 2015 TaxPub(DT) 3520 (Del-HC) Cheminvest Ltd. v. ITO (2009) 124 TTJ 577 (Del.)(SB) : 2009 TaxPub(DT) 1964 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED :
FAVOUR : in assessee's favour
A.Y. :
SUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT |