Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED Vanita Sanjeev Anand v. ITO 2020 TaxPub(DT) 0698 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Aradhna Estate (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 0968 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED Sky Light Hospitality LLP v. Asstt. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 0762 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Ankit Agrochem (P.) Ltd. v. Jt. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 0186 (Raj-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society 2017 TaxPub(DT) 3941 (SC)
REFERRED Pushpak Bullion (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 3914 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED CIT-I v. Lalit Kumar Bardia Prop Aditya Jewellers 2017 TaxPub(DT) 2052 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. RMG Polyvinyl (I) Ltd. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 2034 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. Meenakshi Overseas (P.) Ltd. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 1791 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Paramount Intercontinental (P) Ltd. v. ITO 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0797 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. Paramount Communication (P) Ltd. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0794 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Ankit Financial Services Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0461 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED VMT Spinning Co. Ltd. v. CIT 2016 TaxPub(DT) 4428 (P&H-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. Silver Line 2016 TaxPub(DT) 0597 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. G&G Pharma India Ltd. 2015 TaxPub(DT) 4054 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Fast Booking (I) (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 3589 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Jolly Fantasy World Ltd. 2015 TaxPub(DT) 1602 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED Asstt. CIT v. Sunil Kumar Jain 2014 TaxPub(DT) 1489 (Chhattisgarh-HC)
REFERRED Dy. CIT & Ors. v. Zaveri & Co. Exports & Ors. 2008 TaxPub(DT) 2297 (Adh-Trib)
REFERRED Cargo Clearing Agency (Gujarat) v. Joint CIT 2008 TaxPub(DT) 2202 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED ACIT v. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. 2007 TaxPub(DT) 1257 (SC)
REFERRED R. Dalmia & Anr. v. CIT 1999 TaxPub(DT) 1165 (SC)
REFERRED Orient Novelties (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax 1999 TaxPub(DT) 1165 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer & Ors. 1999 TaxPub(DT) 0348 (SC)
REFERRED National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT 1998 TaxPub(DT) 0342 (SC)
REFERRED Sardar Harvinder Singh Sehgal & Ors. v. Assistant CIT & Ors. 1997 TaxPub(DT) 1252 (Gau-HC)
REFERRED Income Tax Officer v. Selected Dalurband Coal Co. (P) Ltd. 1996 TaxPub(DT) 0233 (SC)
REFERRED CIT v. V.D. Saraf (HUF) 1994 TaxPub(DT) 0192 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Sun Engineering Works (P) Ltd. 1992 TaxPub(DT) 1434 (SC)
REFERRED R. Dalmia & Ors. (Aop) v. CIT 1992 TaxPub(DT) 0839 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer 1991 TaxPub(DT) 1550 (SC)
REFERRED Income Tax Officer v. Mewalal Dwarka Prasad 1989 TaxPub(DT) 0928 (SC)
REFERRED Ganga Saran & Sons (P) Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer & Ors. 1981 TaxPub(DT) 0952 (SC)
REFERRED New Kaiser-I-Hind Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd. v. CIT 1977 TaxPub(DT) 0239 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Chhagan Lal & Ors. v. Income Tax Officer & Anr. 1962 TaxPub(DT) 0118 (Raj-HC)
REFERRED Bhimraj Pannalal v. CIT 1961 TaxPub(DT) 0124 (SC)
REFERRED Radhakant Jagannath Prasad v. V.K. Johri & Anr. 1960 TaxPub(DT) 0011 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Bhimraj Panna Lal v. CIT 1957 TaxPub(DT) 0136 (Pat-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Mahaliram Ramjidas 1940 TaxPub(DT) 0043 (Privy Council)
 
The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 3623 (Del-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 148

Where AO analyzed report of Investigation Wing and formed basis of reasons for escapement of income in case of assessee on allegation that assessee obtained bogus/accommodation entries from certain entities, reassessment was held to be valid considering specific reference made by AO as regards entries obtained by assessee from said entities.

Reassessment - Reason to believe - Assessee obtained bogus/accommodation entries from certain entities according to information recieved from Investigation Wing. -

Assessee-individual was proprietor of a concern engaged in business of share trading.He filed regular return for relevant year. A search under section 132 was carried out at his residence and undisclosed income unearthed and block assessment proceedings were initiated under section 158BC and order was passed accordingly. Subsequent to block assessment, AO received information from Investigation Wing that proprietary concern of assessee obtained certain bogus/accommodation entries. AO issued notice under section 148 for reopening assessment. Assessee contended that notice issued on borrowed satisfaction without application of mind was invalid. Held: AO analyzed report of Investigation Wing and formed basis of reasons after specific reference of entries obtained from certain entities. AO reproduced all entries with details of amount, date of transaction, bank account from which entry was given, instrument number, etc. AO also mentioned that no scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) was completed in the case of assessee and therefore no information relating to transaction was available on record. At initiation stage, what is required is 'reason to believe' on the established fact of escapement of income. At stage of issue of notice, the only question is whether there was relevant material on which a reasonable person could have requisite belief. Whether the material should conclusively prove escapement is not the concern at this stage.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : Against the assessee

A.Y. : 2000-01


INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 148 read with Section 158BC

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT

TaxPublishers.in

'Kedarnath', 7, Avadh Vihar, Near Nirali Dhani,

Chopasni Road

Jodhpur - 342 008 (Rajasthan) INDIA

Phones : 9785602619 (11 am - 5 pm)

E-Mail : mail@taxpublishers.in / mail.taxpublishers@gmail.com