The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 1560 (Bom-HC)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 11

Tribunal was justified in confirming finding of CIT(A) that deposit of Rs. 6.68 crore made by assessee-trust was in pursuant of a valid lease agreement for use of premises and various other facilities and that assessee had used the same for carrying out educational activities/charitable purposes.

Charitable trusts - Exemption under section 11 - Deposit made by assessee-trust in term of lease agreement alleged by revenue to be 'diversion of funds' amongst interested parties -

Revenue challenged order of Tribunal relying on lease agreement between assessee and the lessor ignoring that transaction was not at arm's length and was between interested parties. Case of revenue was that Tribunal failed to consider advance paid by assessee of Rs. 6.68 crores claimed to be 'deposit for leased assets' and payment of Rs. 5 Lakhs as monthly rental against a property of Rs. 31 Crores, which in itself proved that lease deed was for diverting the funds of assessee to its interested concern. Held: First appellate authority came to conclude that assessee had proved that premises and assets envisaged in lease agreement were actually used by assessee for its educational activities/charitable purposes. In such circumstances, first appellate authority held that there was no case of any benefit given/derived by specified person. Holding that denial of exemption was unjustified being not based on facts, first appellate authority directed AO to delete additions and to allow exemption. Tribunal reiterated as a finding of fact that deposit of Rs. 6,68,00,000.00 was in pursuant of a valid lease agreement for user of premises and various other facilities. Assessee had used premises and other leased assets for carrying out educational activities/charitable purposes. Tribunal further held that departmental representative of the revenue could not controvert findings of fact returned by appellate authority.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour

A.Y. :



IN THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT

UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.

CIT v. Kalyani Charitable Trust

Income Tax Appeal No. 2022 of 2017

4 February, 2020

Appellant by: N.C. Mohanty

ORDER

P.C.

1. Heard Mr. Mohanty, learned standing counsel, revenue for the appellant.

2. This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for short) is preferred by the revenue against the Order, dated 10-1-2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai 'A' Bench, Mumbai ('Tribunal' for short) in Income Tax Appeal No. 198/Mum/2015 for the assessment year 2010-11.

3. Appellant has projected the following two questions as substantial questions of law :--

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT