|
The Tax Publishers2019 TaxPub(DT) 4572 (Bom-HC) INCOME TAX ACT, 1961
Section 32(1)(ii)
The expression “or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature” used in Explanation 3 to section 32(1)(ii) was wide enough to include payment of non-compete fees. Accordingly, assessee had rightly claimed depreciation on non-compete fees, being an intangible asset.
|
Depreciation - Allowability - Payment of non-compete fees -
Assessee made payment of non-compete fees and claimed depreciation thereon. Revenue contended that this being an intangible asset, no depreciation would be allowable under section 32. Held: Rights acquired by the assessee under non-compete agreement not only give enduring benefit, protected the assessee's business against competence, that too from a person who had closely worked with the assessee in the same business. The expression “or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature” used in Explanation 3 to section 32(1)(ii) was wide enough to include payment of non-compete fees. Accordingly, assessee had rightly claimed depreciation.
REFERRED : Pr. CIT v. Ferromatic Milacron India Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 99 taxmann.com 154 (Guj) : 2018 TaxPub(DT) 6768 (Guj-HC)
FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.
A.Y. :
INCOME TAX ACT, 1961
Section 36(1)(iii)
SUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT |