Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED CIT v. M.S. Aggarwal 2018 TaxPub(DT) 2537 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Dr. A.V. Sreekumar v. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 0758 (Ker-HC)
REFERRED Deniel Merchants (P) Ltd. & Anr. v ITO & Anr. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 5217 (SC)
REFERRED Daniel Merchants (P) Ltd. & Anr. v. ITO & Anr. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 5196 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED Pebble Investment & Finance Ltd. v. ITO 2017 TaxPub(DT) 4669 (SC)
REFERRED Success Tours & Travels (P) Ltd. & Anr. v. ITO & Ors. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 1368 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED Pragati Financial Management Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 1246 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED Aim Fincon (P.) Ltd. v. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 1123 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Avinash Kumar Setia 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0945 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Rajmandir Estates (P.) Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0344 (SC)
REFERRED Pebble Investment & Finance Ltd. v. ITO 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0300 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Dayawanti v. CIT 2016 TaxPub(DT) 4888 (Del-HC)
REFERRED E.N. Gopakumar v. CIT 2016 TaxPub(DT) 4661 (Ker-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Promy Kuriakose 2016 TaxPub(DT) 4081 (Ker-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. ST. Francis Clay Decor Tiles 2016 TaxPub(DT) 3010 (Ker-HC)
REFERRED Rajmandir Estates (P) Ltd. v. Pr. CIT 2016 TaxPub(DT) 2834 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Amitabh Bachchan 2016 TaxPub(DT) 2291 (SC)
REFERRED Commissioner of Income-tax v. Lancy Constructions 2016 TaxPub(DT) 1207 (Karn-HC)
REFERRED Principal CIT v. Kurele Paper Mills P. Ltd. 2016 TaxPub(DT) 1068 (Del-HC)
REFERRED B. Kishore Kumar v. Dy. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 5204 (SC)
REFERRED Video Master v. Jt. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 3763 (SC)
REFERRED CIT v. Kabul Chawla 2015 TaxPub(DT) 3486 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Subhlakshmi Vanijya (P) Ltd. v. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 2950 (Kol-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Continental Warehousing Corpn Ltd. 2015 TaxPub(DT) 2182 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Raj Hans Towers (P) Ltd. v. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 2063 (Del-HC)
REFERRED B. Kishore Kumar v. Dy. CIT 2014 TaxPub(DT) 4195 (Mad-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Raj Kumar Arora 2014 TaxPub(DT) 3949 (All-HC)
REFERRED Lala Harbhagwan Das Memorial & Dr. Prem Hospital (P.) Ltd. v. CIT 2014 TaxPub(DT) 1913 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED DIT v. Charanjiv Charitable Trust 2014 TaxPub(DT) 1767 (Del-HC)
REFERRED DIT v. Jyoti Foundation 2013 TaxPub(DT) 2463 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Bhagirath Aggarwal v. CIT 2013 TaxPub(DT) 0672 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Infosys Technologies Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 0910 (Karn-HC)
REFERRED Airports Authority of India v. CIT 2012 TaxPub(DT) 0584 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Hindustan Marketing & Advertising Co. Ltd. 2011 TaxPub(DT) 0482 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Rajalakshmi Mills Ltd. v. ITO 2009 TaxPub(DT) 1678 (Chen-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Toyota Motor Corporation 2008 TaxPub(DT) 1862 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Society For Integrated Development In Urban & Rural Areas v. Deputy CIT 2004 TaxPub(DT) 0360 (Hyd-Trib)
REFERRED Action For Welfare & Awakening In Rural Environment (Aware) v. Deputy CIT 2003 TaxPub(DT) 1163 (AP-HC)
REFERRED Ram Bhawan Dharamshala v. State of Rajasthan 2002 TaxPub(DT) 1492 (Raj-HC)
REFERRED Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT 2000 TaxPub(DT) 1227 (SC)
REFERRED CIT v. Seshasayee Paper & Boards Ltd. 2000 TaxPub(DT) 0243 (Mad-HC)
REFERRED Agappa Child Centre v. CIT 1997 TaxPub(DT) 0611 (Ker-HC)
REFERRED Swarup Vegetable Products v. CIT 1991 TaxPub(DT) 0451 (All-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Kanda Rice Mills 1989 TaxPub(DT) 0891 (P&H-HC)
REFERRED Gee Vee Enterprises v. Additional CIT & Ors. 1975 TaxPub(DT) 0267 (Del-HC)
 
The Tax Publishers2019 TaxPub(DT) 6569 (Del-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 263

Keeping in view the facts that AO had duly examined the issue and there was nothing on record regarding receipt of any unaccounted monies, and as per the MCI Guidelines which allow the wards of the NRIs to be admitted under the NRI quota and keeping in view the fact, that anything prejudicial to the interest of Revenue had been brought by the Pr. CIT, no action under section 263 was, therefore, called for on this ground.

Revision under section 263 - Erroneous and prejudicial order - Admission of students to NRI quota - Lack of enquiry

The examination of the parents under section 131 showed that trust was admitting students in NRI quota without any NRI background of the students or their family members. The Pr. CIT in the order passed under section 263 held that, from the field inquiries it had been gathered about the fact that substantial amounts have been received by the assessee-trust from the parents of students seeking admission in particular quotas in these colleges mainly in MBBS/MD/Dental Branches. The assessee-trust was violating the provisions of Medical Council of India, Delhi and the notification of Haryana Government No. 16/14/2014-6HB-TV, dated 30-5-2014 in this regard. Pr. CIT held that since the guidelines given by the State have been violated, and the AO had not obtained the list of students during the assessments nor conducted proper enquiries about violation of MCI Guidelines, the assessment order was liable to be set aside on this ground.Held: Complete details pertaining to NRI quota were filed before the AO and PCIT which consists of FIRC, affidavit of parents, students and norms of MCI. When the question was posed to the revenue as well as the AR regarding any adverse finding by any regulatory authority or any sanctions levied by MCI, the reply from both the parties was negative. Similarly, there were no violations of RBI and the foreign currency received from the students admitted in NRI quota had been duly accounted in the P&L account. Keeping in view the facts that the AO had duly examined the issue and there was nothing on record regarding receipt of any unaccounted monies, and as per the MCI guidelines which allow the wards of the NRIs to be admitted under the NRI quota and keeping in view the fact, that anything prejudicial to the interest of Revenue had been brought by the Pr. CIT, no action under section 263 was, therefore, called for on this ground.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. :


INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 263

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT