|
The Tax Publishers2019 TaxPub(DT) 7499 (All-HC) : (2020) 312 CTR 0381 : (2020) 270 TAXMAN 0071 INCOME TAX ACT, 1961
Section 158BC read with section 132(4A)
Where CIT(A) had given part relief to assessee towards addition made pursuant to search action, Tribunal was not justified in reversing finding of CIT(A)only on basis of presumption under section 132(4A) without recording any finding as to how loose sheets recovered during search, were linked with assessee
|
Search and seizure - Presumption under section 132(4A) - Linkage of loose sheets found with assessee not established -
Pursuant to order passed under section 158BC read with section 263, AO had made addition towards undisclosed income. CIT(A) gave part relief to assessee, whereas Tribunal reversed finding of CIT(A). Assessee contended Tribunal did not record any finding as to how papers found during search corroborated with findings recorded by AO during search proceedings. Assessee further contended that on basis of presumption available to revenue under section 132(4A), Tribunal had reversed orders of CIT(A), who had given part relief to assessee. Held: Tribunal only on basis of presumption under section 132(4A), reversed finding of CIT(A), without recording any finding as to how loose sheets recovered during search, were linked with assessee. In absence of corroborative evidence, Tribunal was not justified in reversing finding by CIT(A). Thus, order of Tribunal reversing finding of CIT(A) in regard to deletion of addition and restoring order of AO on mere presumption was unsustainable. Accordingly, order of Tribunal was set aside to that extent and matter was remitted back to Tribunal to decide afresh.
REFERRED : CIT v. Shadiram, Ganga Prasad 2010 UPTC 840
FAVOUR : Partly in assessee's favour
A.Y. :
IN THE ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT |