Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED Asstt. CIT v. Krystal Colloids (P) Ltd. 2018 TaxPub(DT) 5748 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Svitzer Hazira (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 4189 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED SCM Garments (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 3561 (Chen-Trib)
REFERRED K.L. Hitech Secure Print Ltd. v. Jt. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 2561 (Hyd-Trib)
REFERRED Lanco Kondapalli Power Ltd. v. JCIT 2014 TaxPub(DT) 2699 (Hyd-Trib)
REFERRED Tamilnadu Petro Products Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2011 TaxPub(DT) 0601 (Mad-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Woodward Governor India P. Ltd. 2009 TaxPub(DT) 1628 (SC)
REFERRED Dy. CIT v. Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. 2009 TaxPub(DT) 0604 (Jp-Trib)
REFERRED Dy. CIT v. Andhra Petrochemicals Ltd. 2009 TaxPub(DT) 0508 (Visakhapatnam-Trib)
REFERRED Asstt. CIT v. Goldmine Shares & finance (P) Ltd 2008 TaxPub(DT) 1976 (Ahd-Trib)
REFERRED Honda Siel Power Products Ltd. v. CIT 2007 TaxPub(DT) 1553 (SC)
REFERRED West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. Assistant CIT 2006 TaxPub(DT) 1560 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Income Tax Officer v. Samiran Majumdar 2006 TaxPub(DT) 0599 (Kol-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Orissa Cement Ltd. 2002 TaxPub(DT) 0946 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Orient Paper Mills Ltd. 1989 TaxPub(DT) 0839 (SC)
REFERRED CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty 1981 TaxPub(DT) 0902 (SC)
REFERRED Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT 1979 TaxPub(DT) 0782 (SC)
REFERRED Kedarnath Jute Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. CIT 1971 TaxPub(DT) 0366 (SC)
REFERRED CIT v. Chunilal Prabhudas & Co. 1970 TaxPub(DT) 0199 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Mugneeram Bangur & Co. (Land Department) 1965 TaxPub(DT) 0302 (SC)
 
The Tax Publishers2019 TaxPub(DT) 7623 (Visakhapatnam-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 32(1)(ii)

Where assessee acquired another company and obtained various benefits including know-how, patents, copyright, licenses and other commercial and business advantages and treated all of them as goodwill then what was seen collectively as 'goodwill' consisted of all the aforementioned rights and advantages which were mentioned in section 32 and accordingly, amortisation of goodwill had to be allowed.

Depreciation - Allowability - Excess consideration paid as goodwill on business acquisition -

Assessee-company claimed depreciation on goodwill. AO required assesse to explain as to why the depreciation on goodwill should not be disallowed. Assessee stated that it had acquired shares of Coastal Papers Private Ltd. (CPL), consequently CPL lost its identify and merged with assessee company. The excess consideration paid was considered as goodwill and amortised over a period of time. AO not being convinced with the explanation, disallowed depreciation.Held: Due to acquisition of CPL, assessee company obtained various benefits including know-how, patents, copyright, licenses and other commercial and business advantages. What was seen collectively as 'goodwill' consisted of all the aforementioned rights and advantages which were mentioned in section 32. Accordingly, amortisation of goodwill had to be allowed.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. :


INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 32(1)

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT