Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED Pioneer Town Planners (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 5311 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. S. Goyanka Lime & Chemicals Ltd. 2018 TaxPub(DT) 4342 (MP-HC)
REFERRED ITO v. Virat Credit & Holdings (P) Ltd. 2018 TaxPub(DT) 1077 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Aradhna Estate (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 0968 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED Kalpana Shantilal Haria v. Asstt. CIT & Ors. 2018 TaxPub(DT) 0217 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Ankit Agrochem (P.) Ltd. v. Jt. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 0186 (Raj-HC)
REFERRED Kanpur Texel (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT & Anr. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 5314 (All-HC)
REFERRED Yum! Restaurants Asia Pte. Ltd. v. Dy. DIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 4485 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Pushpak Bullion (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 3914 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. RMG Polyvinyl (I) Ltd. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 2034 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. Meenakshi Overseas (P.) Ltd. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 1791 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Aaspas Multimedia Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 1665 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. Paramount Communication (P) Ltd. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0794 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Ankit Financial Services Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0461 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. N.C. Cables Ltd. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0264 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. S. Goyanka Lime & Chemical Ltd. 2015 TaxPub(DT) 5456 (SC)
REFERRED Andaman Timber Industries v. CCE 2015 TaxPub(DT) 5186 (SC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. G&G Pharma India Ltd. 2015 TaxPub(DT) 4054 (Del-HC)
REFERRED GTL Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 0466 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Atul Kumar Swami 2014 TaxPub(DT) 2106 (Del-HC)
REFERRED DSJ Communication Ltd. v. Dy. CIT & Anr. 2014 TaxPub(DT) 1803 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Aroni Commercials Ltd. v. Dy. CIT & Anr. 2014 TaxPub(DT) 1649 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Vardhman Industries 2014 TaxPub(DT) 1497 (Raj-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 1644 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Sarthak Securities Co. (P) Ltd. v. ITO 2010 TaxPub(DT) 2311 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Asian Paints Ltd. v. Dy. CIT & Anr. 2008 TaxPub(DT) 0496 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED United Electrical Company (P) Ltd. v. CIT & Ors. 2002 TaxPub(DT) 1670 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Arjun Singh & Anr. v. Assistant Director of Income-tax & Ors. 2000 TaxPub(DT) 0444 (MP-HC)
REFERRED Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer & Ors. 1999 TaxPub(DT) 0348 (SC)
REFERRED CIT v. Atlas Cycle Industries 1989 TaxPub(DT) 1149 (P&H-HC)
 
The Tax Publishers2019 TaxPub(DT) 7630 (Del-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 147

AO merely repeated report of Investigation Wing in the reasons and formed his belief that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment without arriving at his satisfaction. Accordingly, there was no independent application of mind by AO to report of Investigation Wing to form the basis for recording reasons which were also proved to be incorrect. The reasons failed to demonstrate link between alleged tangible material and formation of reasons to believe that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment. Accordingly, reassessment was quashed as invalid.

Reassessment - Reason to believe - No independent application of mind by AO to report of Investigation Wing -

AO received information from investigation wing as to assesse having received accommodation entries in the guise of share application money. Accordingly, AO reopened assessment and made addition under section 68.Held: AO merely repeated report of Investigation Wing in the reasons and formed his belief that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment without arriving at his satisfaction. Accordingly, there was no independent application of mind by AO to report of Investigation Wing to form the basis for recording reasons which were also proved to be incorrect. The reasons failed to demonstrate link between alleged tangible material and formation of reasons to believe that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment. Accordingly, reassessment was quashed as invalid.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. :



IN THE ITAT, DELHI BENCH

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT