Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED Saurabh Agarwal v. DCIT 2019 TaxPub(DT) 6540 (Agra-Trib)
REFERRED Pratibha Pipes & Structurals Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2019 TaxPub(DT) 5135 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. Shreelekha Damani 2018 TaxPub(DT) 7540 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Gopal S. Pandit v. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 4307 (Karn-HC)
REFERRED Ghanshyam v. ITO 2018 TaxPub(DT) 4134 (Agra-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur 2018 TaxPub(DT) 2775 (SC)
REFERRED Dr. Prannoy Roy v. Dy. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 2531 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Sabh Infrastructure Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 4248 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Shreelekha Damani v. Dy. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 3650 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Akil Gulamali Somji v. ITO 2012 TaxPub(DT) 3167 (Pune-Trib)
REFERRED Sahara India (Firm) v. CIT 2008 TaxPub(DT) 1907 (SC)
REFERRED K.C. Builders & Anr. v. Assistant CIT 2004 TaxPub(DT) 1323 (SC)
REFERRED Kailash Moudgil v. Deputy CIT 2000 TaxPub(DT) 1056 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Verma Roadways v. Assistant CIT 2000 TaxPub(DT) 0840 (Ahd-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Mrs. Ratanbai N.K. Dubhash 1998 TaxPub(DT) 0893 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Jai Prakash Singh 1996 TaxPub(DT) 1021 (SC)
REFERRED K.M. Bansal (Decd.) Through L/R v. CIT 1992 TaxPub(DT) 0400 (All-HC)
REFERRED Parashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer 1977 TaxPub(DT) 0725 (SC)
REFERRED Chhugamal Rajpal v. S.P. Chaliha & Ors. 1971 TaxPub(DT) 0314 (SC)
REFERRED S. Narayanappa & Ors. v. CIT 1967 TaxPub(DT) 0198 (SC)
REFERRED The Presidency Talkies Ltd. v. Additional Income Tax Officer 1954 TaxPub(DT) 0062 (Mad-HC)
 
The Tax Publishers2019 TaxPub(DT) 7648 (Agra-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 153

From the approval Order of Addl. CIT was evident that despite availability of time, Addl. CIT had been taking excuse of limitation and chose to grant approval without application of his own mind but on the undertaking of AO that 'while completing assessment as per draft assessment order, all the observations made in appraisal report relating to examination/investigation as also issues identified in the course of examination of sized material were carefully considered. As approval was granted by superior authority in mechanical manner without application of mind, the very purpose of obtaining approval was defeated and assessment made by AO based on such an approval was also null and void.

Search and seizure - Assessment under section 153A - Validity - Mechanical approval granted by Addl. CIT under section 153D

Assessee challenged validity of search assessment framed under section 153A on the ground of mechanical approval granted by Addl. CIT under section 153D.Held: From the approval Order of Addl. CIT it was evident that despite availability of time, Addl. CIT had been taking excuse of limitation and chose to grant approval without application of his own mind but on the undertaking of AO under section 153D. As approval was granted by superior authority in mechanical manner without application of mind, the very purpose of obtaining approval was defeated and assessment made by AO based on such an approval was also null and void.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. : 2008- 09 & 2011-12



IN THE ITAT, AGRA BENCH

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT