The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 0102 (Hyd-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 45(1)

Assessee inherited subject property in the situation contemplated by section 8 of Hindu Scuccession Act, 1956. He did not take it as Kartha of his own undivided family, but took it in his individual capacity. As per principles of intestacy, joint family property ceased to be HUF property on death of Hindu Male and property devolves on heirs in their individual capacity and thus property inherited by respective assessee was their individual property and, therefore, capital gains, if any, was exigible to tax in their individual hands alone and not in the hands of HUF.

Capital gains - Chargeability - In the hands of HUF or individual heirs - Assessee being Karta of HUF and concerned property devolved on assessee on his father's death

Assessee along with other groups of family members sold certain piece of land but paid no capital gains tax. AO noticed that land sold by assessee was ancestral property of the assessee and therefore, AO took the view that capital gain had to be taxed in the hands of HUF, whose Kartha was the assessee. Assessee's case was that after death of grand father of assessee, concerned property devolved on assessee's father and after death of father the property devolved on his five children including assessee as well.Held: Assessee inherited subject property in the situation contemplated by section 8 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956. He did not take it as Kartha of his own undivided family, but took it in his individual capacity. As per principles of intestacy, joint family property ceased to be HUF property on death of Hindu Male and property devolves on heirs in their individual capacity and thus property inherited by respective assessee was their individual property and, therefore, capital gains, if any, was exigible to tax in their individual hands alone and not in the hands of HUF.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. : 2007-08



IN THE ITAT, HYDERABAD BENCH

P. MADHAVI DEVI, J.M. & S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, A.M.

Kandada Babu Rao (HUF) v. Asstt. CIT

ITA Nos. 1001/H/11, 913/H/12, 914/H/12, 1541/H/13, 1539/H/13, 1540/H/13

23 October, 2019

Assessee by: Mohd. Afzal & A.V. Raghuram

Revenue by: Kiran Katta & YVST Sai

ORDER

P. Madhavi Devi, J.M.

All these group appeals are filed by different assessees. Since common issues are involved, these appeals were clubbed and heard together, therefore, a common and consolidated order is passed in all these appeals for the sake of convenience.

ITA No. 1001/Hyd/2019 in the case of Kadada Babu Rao (HUF)

2. This is the assessees appeal for assessment year 2007-08 against the order of Commissioner (Appeals)-III, Hyderabad dated 25-3-2011.

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT