Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED Amit Polyprints (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2019 TaxPub(DT) 6782 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED Gopal Chand Mundhra & Sons v. ITO 2019 TaxPub(DT) 5436 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED South Yarra Holdings v. ITO 2019 TaxPub(DT) 2746 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED SBS Realtors (P) Ltd. v. ITO 2019 TaxPub(DT) 1991 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Sonia Gandhi v. Asstt. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 5844 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Home Finders Housing Ltd. v. ITO 2018 TaxPub(DT) 3182 (SC)
REFERRED Baldevbhai Bhikhabhai Patel v. Dy. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 2838 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED Rakesh Gupta v. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 2542 (P&H-HC)
REFERRED Ankit Agrochem (P.) Ltd. v. Jt. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 0186 (Raj-HC)
REFERRED Sabh Infrastructure Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 4248 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Paramount Communications Ltd. v. Pr. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 4022 (SC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. Meenakshi Overseas (P.) Ltd. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 1791 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Aaspas Multimedia Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 1665 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. Paramount Communication (P) Ltd. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0794 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Devi Electronics (P.) Ltd. v. ITO 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0285 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. N.C. Cables Ltd. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0264 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. S. Goyanka Lime & Chemical Ltd. 2015 TaxPub(DT) 5456 (SC)
REFERRED Acorus Unitech Wireless (P) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2014 TaxPub(DT) 1400 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Yuvraj v. UOI & Anr. 2009 TaxPub(DT) 1704 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Gkn Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer & Ors. 2003 TaxPub(DT) 0734 (SC)
REFERRED Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer & Ors. 1999 TaxPub(DT) 0348 (SC)
 
The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 0246 (Del-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 147 Section 151

Pr.CIT had given approval to reopening of assessment in a mechanical manner without due application of mind by mentioning only that 'YES. I AM SATISFIED' with the reasons recorded for initiating proceedings under section 147 and therefore, reassessment proceedings were invalid in the absence of valid approval under section 151.

Reassessment - Validity - Mechanical approval accorded by Pr.CIT for issuing section 148 notice -

Assessee challenged validity of reopening of assessment on the ground of Pr.CIT having granted mechanical approval for issuance of notice under section 148.Held: Pr.CIT had given approval to reopening of assessment in a mechanical manner without due application of mind by mentioning only that 'YES. I AM SATISFIED' with the reasons recorded for initiating proceedings under section 147 and therefore, reassessment proceedings were invalid in the absence of valid approval under section 151.

Followed:ITAT, SMC, Bench, New Delhi decision dated 21-8-2019 in the case of Gopal Chand Manudhra & Sons; Damyanti Mundhra; Ramdev Mundhra; Shriya Devi Mundhra & Gopal Chand Mundhra v. ITO [decided in ITA No. 1375; 1721; 1722; 1523- 1524/Del/2019] : 2019 TaxPub(DT) 5436 (Del-Trib).

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. :



IN THE ITAT, DELHI BENCH

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT