Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED ITO v. Synergy Finlease (P) Ltd. 2019 TaxPub(DT) 2405 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd. 2019 TaxPub(DT) 1628 (SC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. NDR Promoters (P) Ltd. 2019 TaxPub(DT) 0886 (Del-HC)
REFERRED J.J. Development (P) Ltd. v. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 6823 (SC)
REFERRED Pratham Telecom India (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 6453 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Konark Structural Engineers (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT & Anr. 2018 TaxPub(DT) 4127 (SC)
REFERRED DRB Exports (P) Ltd. v. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 2724 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED Konark Structural Engineering (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 0701 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Prem Castings (P) Ltd. v. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 5245 (All-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. Bikram Singh 2017 TaxPub(DT) 3937 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Rick Lunsford Trade & Investment Ltd. v. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0915 (SC)
REFERRED Rick Lunsford Trade & Investment Ltd. v. CIT 2016 TaxPub(DT) 3442 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Focus Exports (P) Ltd. 2014 TaxPub(DT) 4283 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Navodaya Castles (P) Ltd. 2014 TaxPub(DT) 3789 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Empire Builtech (P) Ltd. 2014 TaxPub(DT) 1850 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. N.R. Portfolio (P) Ltd. 2014 TaxPub(DT) 0501 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. MAF Academy (P.) Ltd. 2014 TaxPub(DT) 0087 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Ultra Modern Exports Pvt Ltd. 2013 TaxPub(DT) 0917 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Nipun Builders & Develpers Pvt. Ltd. 2013 TaxPub(DT) 0526 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Frostair Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 3185 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Nova Promoters & Finlease (P) Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 1558 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. B.N. Bhattachargee & Anr. 1979 TaxPub(DT) 1026 (SC)
 
The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 0743 (Del-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 68

Considering totality of facts of assessee's case and in the interest of justice, issue was to restored to AO with direction to give one final opportunity to assessees to substantiate its case by producing directors of investor companies for recording of their statements and produce evidence to satisfaction of AO regarding identity and creditworthiness of investor companies and genuineness of the transaction of receipt of share capital/premium.

Income from undisclosed sources - Addition under section 68 - Receipt of share capital/premium - Assessee pleading to have furnished documentary evidence and denial by AO to cross-examine alleged entry providers

AO on the basis of statement recorded during search in case of certain parties treated share capital/premium received by assessee as unexplained credit under section 68 and made addition. Assessee contended that it had filed various documents to sub stantiate identity and creditworthiness of share applicants and genuineness of transactions, however, despite request by assessee, no opportunity to cross/examine the persons who admitted to have received cash amounts from time to time from assessee for providing accommodation entries in the form of share capital and share premium to assessee, was provided.Held: Considering totality of facts of assessee's case and in the interest of justice, issue was to restored to AO with direction to give one final opportunity to assessees to substantiate its case by producing directors of investor companies for recording of their statements and produce evidence to satisfaction of the AO regarding the identity and creditworthiness of investor companies and genuineness of the transaction.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : Matter remanded.

A.Y. : 2015-16


INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 250(4) Section 250(6)

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT