Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED Vivek Kumar Kathotia v. Dy. CIT & Vice Versa 2013 TaxPub(DT) 0105 (Kol-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Indeo Airways Pvt. Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 3186 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Kailashben Manharlal Chokshi v. CIT 2010 TaxPub(DT) 0190 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED Contech Transport Services (P) Ltd. & Ors. v. Asstt. CIT 2009 TaxPub(DT) 1114 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2009 TaxPub(DT) 0495 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Ajit Chintaman Karve v. ITO 2009 TaxPub(DT) 0049 (Pune-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Gurubachhan Singh J. Juneja 2008 TaxPub(DT) 1637 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED Jain Trading Co. v. ITO 2007 TaxPub(DT) 0689 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Sukh Ram v. Assistant CIT 2006 TaxPub(DT) 1275 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Anand Autoride Ltd. v. Joint CIT 2006 TaxPub(DT) 0889 (Ahd-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. C.L. Khatri 2006 TaxPub(DT) 0349 (MP-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Shital Prasad Kharag Prasad 2006 TaxPub(DT) 0119 (All-HC)
REFERRED Kantilal Prabhudas Patel v. Deputy CIT (Investigation) 2005 TaxPub(DT) 0873 (Ind-Trib)
REFERRED Bajrang Lal Bansal v. Deputy CIT 2005 TaxPub(DT) 0495 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Assistant CIT v. Radhey Shyam Poddar (HUF) 2004 TaxPub(DT) 0811 (Asr-Trib)
REFERRED Chitra Devi v. Assistant CIT 2002 TaxPub(DT) 1657 (Jod-Trib)
REFERRED Assistant CIT v. Nitin Mukesh Mathur 2002 TaxPub(DT) 1340 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Smt. Rajrani Gupta v. Deputy CIT 2000 TaxPub(DT) 0535 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kahan Pal 1999 TaxPub(DT) 0751 (P&H-HC)
REFERRED Abhishek Corporation v. Deputy CIT 1999 TaxPub(DT) 0751 (Ahd-Trib)
REFERRED Dr. R.M.L. Mehrotra v. Assistant CIT 1999 TaxPub(DT) 0616 (All-Trib)
REFERRED Kantilal & Bros. v. Assistant CIT 1995 TaxPub(DT) 0687 (Pune-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. S.M. Omer 1993 TaxPub(DT) 0074 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED Sunrolling Mills (P) Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer & Ors. 1986 TaxPub(DT) 0615 (Cal-HC)
REFERRED Pullangode Rubber & Produce Co. Ltd. v. State of Kerala & Anr. 1973 TaxPub(DT) 0089 (SC)
REFERRED S. Sarabhaiah Shetty & Sons v. CIT 1967 TaxPub(DT) 0053 (AP-HC)
REFERRED Mysore Fertiliser Co. v. CIT 1966 TaxPub(DT) 0117 (Mad-HC)
REFERRED Yaggina Veeraraghavulu and Mavuleti Somaraju & Co. v. CIT 1966 TaxPub(DT) 0077 (AP-HC)
REFERRED Seth Nathuram Munnalal v. CIT 1954 TaxPub(DT) 0007 (Nag-HC)
 
The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 0775 (Jp-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 153A Section 153C

Though proceedings were purported to be continued under section 153C however, assessments were complete under section 153A, despite consciously dropping the notice under section 153A. Assessments under sections 153A and 153C are independent and mutually exclusive. An assessment cannot be framed in continuation of both notices and similarly cannot be concluded under section 153A if proceedings are undertaken under section 153C. In view of this, impugned assessments were untenable and bad in law.

Search and seizure - Assessment under section 153A - Validity - Proceedings undertaken under section 153C by dropping initial notice issued under section 153A

During pendency of proceedings under section 153A, AO initiated proceeding under section 153C by dropping proceedings under section 153A.Though proceedings were taken further under notice issued under section 153C however, impugned assessments were ultimately framed under section 153A read with section 143(3) determining income at respective figures.Held: In assessee's case though proceedings were purported to be continued under section 153C however, assessments were completed under section 153A despite consciously dropping the notice under section 153A. Assessments under sections 153A and 153C are independent and mutually exclusive. An assessment cannot be framed in continuation of both notices and similarly cannot be concluded under section 153A if proceedings are undertaken under section 153C. In view of this, impugned assessments were untenable and bad in law.

Relied:Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT (2009) 122 TTJ (Del-Trib) 902 : 2009 TaxPub(DT) 495 (Del-Trib) and CIT v. Shital Prasad Kharag Prasad (2005) 196 CTR (All) 162 : 2006 TaxPub(DT) 0119 (All-HC).

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. : 2006-07



IN THE ITAT, JAIPUR BENCH

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT