The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 1300 (Jp-Trib) : (2020) 078 ITR (Trib) 0320

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 68

Assessee by furnishing plethora of evidences such as confirmatory letter of the share applicant, Copy of acknowledgement of ITR 4 and 5 ,Balance Sheet and P&L account and bank statement, etc., proved identity and creditworthiness of share applicant and genuineness of impugned share transaction. AO had not brought any material on record as a result of any enquiry, therefore, documentary evidence produced by assessee could not be ignored or rejected and addition could not be sustained.

Income from undisclosed sources - Addition under section 68 - Receipt of share application money held as bogus based on investigation report - Assessee furnished evidences to prove identity, creditworthiness and genuineness

AO based on statement recorded by investigation wing in case of alleged entry operator, treated share application money received by assesse as unexplained credit under section 68 and accordingly made addition.Held: Assessee by furnishing confirmatory letter of the share applicant, Copy of the acknowledgement of the ITR 4 and 5, Balance Sheet and P&L account, Bank statement of share applicant wherein the payments made to assessee toward share application money were appearing and Copy of ROC document (Form No. 20B, Form No. 23AC, Form No. 23ACA, Form No. 66, Form No. 23B) and Annual Return for the relevant period (F.Y. 2011-12) and (F.Y. 2015-16), proved identity and creditworthiness of share applicant and genuineness of impugned share transaction. AO had not brought any material on record as a result of any enquiry, therefore, documentary evidence produced by assessee could not be ignored or rejected and addition could not be sustained.

REFERRED : Pr. CIT v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd. (2019) 103 Taxmann.com 48 (SC) : 2019 TaxPub(DT) 1628 (SC), Andaman Timber Industries v. CCE 2015 TaxPub(EX) 2155 (SC), Prem Castings (P) Ltd. v. CIT(A) (2017) 88 Taxmann.com 189 (All) : 2017 TaxPub(DT) 5245 (All-HC), ITO v. APJ Construction (P) Ltd. [ITA No. 722/Del/2015, dated 31-12-2019 (Del-Trib) : 2020 TaxPub(DT) 27 (Del-Trib), Izzy Metals (P) Ltd. v. ITO [ITA No. 75/JP/2018, dt. 1-7-2019], M/s. Jadau Jewellers & Manufacturers (P) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT (2016) 175 TTJ (Jp) 344 : 2016 TaxPub(DT) 0633 (Jp-Trib), Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2009) 122 TTJ 577 (Mum-Trib) : (2009) 22 DTR 362 (Mum-Trib) : 2009 TaxPub(DT) 1638 (Mum-Trib) and Kwal Pro Exports v. Asstt. CIT (2008) 110 ITD 59 (Jod-Trib) : 2008 TaxPub(DT) 0346 (Jod-Trib).

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. :



IN THE ITAT, JAIPUR BENCH

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT