IN THE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, CJ. & VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA, J.

Rajeev Mujumdar v. CIT

I.T.A. No. 7/2020

4 March, 2020

Appeal Dismissed.

Appellant by: G.N. Purohit, Senior Advocate with Rahul Deshmukh, Advocate

Respondent by: Sanjay Lal, Advocate

Ajay Kumar Mittal, CJ.

This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') has been preferred by the assessee against the Order, dated 13-9-2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, Indore (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') in ITA (SS) No. 203/Ind/2018 whereby his appeal against the Order, dated 26-11-2018 of the Commissioner (Appeals) [for brevity 'the CIT(A)'] has been partly allowed deleting only an addition of Rs. 65,20,000 as against the total addition of Rs. 87,60,000 made by the assessing officer towards unaccounted investment. The appeal relates to the assessment year 2013-14.

2. The appellant-assessee has claimed the following substantial questions of law for determination by this Court :--