ACIT v. Jasubhai Engineering Pvt. Ltd. & (ViceVersa)

SUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT


The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 2287 (Mum-Trib) : (2020) 184 ITD 0388 IN THE ITAT, MUMBAI BENCH PAWAN SINGH, J.M. & S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, A.M. ACIT v. Jasubhai Engineering Pvt. Ltd. & (Vice-Versa) ITA No. 7519/Mum/2016 & C.O. No. 176/Mum/2019 6 March, 2020 Revenue Dismissed. Appellant by : Mohd. Rizwan, DR Respondent by : K. Shivaram/Rahul Hakani, AR ORDER *S. Rifaur Rahman, A.M.* The present Appeal has been filed by the revenue and CO filed by the assessee against the order of learned Commissioner (Appeals) 2, Mumbai in short referred as learned CIT (A) , Mumbai, dt. 19-8-2016 for assessment year (in short A.Y.) 2013-14 respectively. 2. Since, the facts raised in the appeal filed by the revenue as well as C.O. filed by the assessee are identical, therefore for the sake of convenience; they are clubbed, heard and disposed of by this consolidt. order. Firstly, we are taking ITA No. 7519/Mum/2016 for assessment year 2013-14 filed by the revenue. SUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT

The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 2287 (Mum-Trib) : (2020) 184 ITD 0388

IN THE ITAT, MUMBAI BENCH

PAWAN SINGH, J.M. & S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, A.M.

ACIT v. Jasubhai Engineering Pvt. Ltd. & (Vice-Versa)

ITA No. 7519/Mum/2016 & C.O. No. 176/Mum/2019

6 March, 2020

Revenue Dismissed.

Appellant by : Mohd. Rizwan, DR

Respondent by : K. Shivaram/Rahul Hakani, AR

ORDER

S. Rifaur Rahman, A.M.

The present Appeal has been filed by the revenue and CO filed by the assessee against the order of learned Commissioner (Appeals) 2, Mumbai in short referred as learned CIT (A) , Mumbai, dt. 19-8-2016 for assessment year (in short A.Y.) 2013-14 respectively.

2. Since, the facts raised in the appeal filed by the revenue as well as C.O. filed by the assessee are identical, therefore for the sake of convenience; they are clubbed, heard and disposed of by this consolidt. order. Firstly, we are taking ITA No. 7519/Mum/2016 for assessment year 2013-14 filed by the revenue.