Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED Centrica India Offshore Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 3208 (SC)
REFERRED CEVA Asia Pacific Holdings Company Pte. Ltd. v. Dy. DIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 0577 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Dy. CIT v. BOC Group Ltd. 2016 TaxPub(DT) 0169 (Kol-Trib)
REFERRED Food World Supermarkets Ltd. v. Dy. DIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 4420 (Bang-Trib)
REFERRED Guangzhou Usha International Ltd., In re 2015 TaxPub(DT) 3910 (AAR)
REFERRED Dy. DIT (International Taxation) v. Lata BSP India 2014 TaxPub(DT) 3526 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Centrica India Offshore (P.) Ltd. v. CIT 2014 TaxPub(DT) 2335 (Del-HC)
REFERRED In Re Steria (India) Ltd. 2014 TaxPub(DT) 2227 (AAR)
REFERRED Parke Davis and Company LLC v. Asstt. CIT 2014 TaxPub(DT) 2194 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Sargent & Lundy, LLC, USA v. Addl. CIT 2013 TaxPub(DT) 2777 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Sunil V. Motiani v. ITO 2013 TaxPub(DT) 2285 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED ITO v. M Far Hotels Ltd. 2013 TaxPub(DT) 1797 (Coch-Trib)
REFERRED In re, Target Corporation India (P) Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2773 (AAR)
REFERRED Avion Systems Inc. v. Deputy Director of IT 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2709 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED DIC Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. Assistant Director of Income-tax, International Taxation 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2517 (Kol-Trib)
REFERRED In re, Thoughtbuzz (P) Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2105 (AAR)
REFERRED Organisation Development (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. Director of IT 2012 TaxPub(DT) 1960 (Chen-Trib)
REFERRED Shell India Markets (P) Ltd., In re 2012 TaxPub(DT) 1024 (AAR)
REFERRED In re, Perfetti Van Melle Holding B.V. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 0727 (AAR)
REFERRED In re, Verizon Data Services India (P) Ltd. 2011 TaxPub(DT) 1711 (AAR)
REFERRED CIT & Anr. v. Arthusa Offshore Co. 2008 TaxPub(DT) 1840 (Uttarakhand-HC)
REFERRED In re, Airports Authority of India 2008 TaxPub(DT) 1719 (AAR)
REFERRED At&S India (P) Ltd., In Re v. 2006 TaxPub(DT) 1856 (AAR)
REFERRED Raymond Limited v. Deputy CIT 2003 TaxPub(DT) 0237 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Central Board of Direct Taxes & Ors. v. Oberoi Hotels (India) Pvt. Ltd. 1998 TaxPub(DT) 1277 (SC)
 
The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 2288 (Del-Trib) : (2020) 079 ITR (Trib) 0222

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 90

As evident from definition clause of fees for technical services under Article 13(4) of Indo-UK DTAA, management services are excluded, however, no document was produced by non-resident assessee in relation to actual services rendered. Accordingly, issue was remanded back to AO for deciding afresh, with direction to assessee to furnish all the necessary documentary evidences in support of the services rendered by assessee to Indian entity including correspondence in respect of services provided.

Double taxation relief - Agreement between India and UK - Management fee from Indian entity - Non-resident pleading management fee to be outside from the purview of fee for technical services, however, without providing supportive evidence

Assessee based at France received management fee from Indian entity for providing various functional and management supports. AO held the same as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under article 13 of DTAA between India-France read with protocol to DTAA. Assessee relied upon restricted scope of Article 13 of Indo-UK, DTAA [since, UK is an OECD Member and Indo-UK DTAA has been entered into on 26-10-1993 (i.e. after 1-9-1989)], wherein scope of 'Fees for Technical Services' is more restricted. Revenue's case was that assessee only submitted a copy of agreement and no other document was submitted. Held: As evident from definition clause of fees for technical services under Article 13(4) of Indo-UK DTAA, management services are excluded. However, assessee had not provided entire correspondence regarding services rendered by assessee to Indian entity and in absence of which AO decided all the three issues on the basis of agreement only, i.e., firstly, whether services were purely managerial or falling under technical/consultancy services; secondly, services were ancillary and subsidiary to application or enjoyment of right, property, information and thirdly, services made available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, etc. No other document was produced by assessee in relation to actual services rendered. Accordingly, issue was remanded back to AO for deciding afresh, with direction to assessee to furnish all the necessary documentary evidences in support of the services rendered by assessee to Indian entity, including correspondence in respect of services provided.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : Matter remanded.

A.Y. : 2011-12


INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 9(1)(vii)

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT