Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED Dy. CIT v. JSW Ltd. 2020 TaxPub(DT) 2142 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. S.G. Asia Holdings (India) (P.) Ltd. 2019 TaxPub(DT) 5325 (SC)
REFERRED AT & T Global Network Services (India) (P) Ltd. v. DCIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 7440 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. AT & T Global Network Services (India) (P) Ltd. 2018 TaxPub(DT) 5829 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. S.G. Asia Holdings (India) (P) Ltd. 2018 TaxPub(DT) 5783 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. New Delhi Television Ltd. 2018 TaxPub(DT) 5530 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Pr. CIT v. New Delhi Television Ltd. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 4576 (Del-HC)
REFERRED New Delhi Television Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 2132 (Del-HC)
REFERRED New Delhi Television Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 1898 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Otters Club v. DIT & Ors. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0689 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. 2015 TaxPub(DT) 4978 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 3520 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. PVP Ventures Ltd. 2014 TaxPub(DT) 1924 (Mad-HC)
REFERRED Biocon Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2013 TaxPub(DT) 2046 (Bang-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Living Media India Ltd. 2013 TaxPub(DT) 2041 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Jagran Prakashan Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (TDS) 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2050 (All-HC)
REFERRED M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports Visakhapatnam v. Asstt. CIT 2012 TaxPub(DT) 1009 (Visakhapatnam-Trib)
REFERRED Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. v. DIT 2011 TaxPub(DT) 0886 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Rotork Controls India (P) Ltd. v. CIT 2009 TaxPub(DT) 1730 (SC)
REFERRED Shivsagar Veg. Restaurant v. Asstt. CIT & ANR. 2009 TaxPub(DT) 1040 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Deputy CIT v. Panamsat International Systems Inc. 2006 TaxPub(DT) 1795 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Bharat Earth Movers v. CIT 2000 TaxPub(DT) 1505 (SC)
REFERRED CIT v. Durga Prasad More 1971 TaxPub(DT) 0375 (SC)
REFERRED Karanpura Development Co. Ltd. v. CIT 1962 TaxPub(DT) 0177 (SC)
 
The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 2528 (Del-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 92CA

Where TPO did not consider issue regarding computation of ALP of corporate guarantee issued by assessee, AO could not himself determine same without referring same to TPO.

Transfer pricing - Computation of ALP - AO, whether empowered to decide issue as regards consideration of corporate guarantee himself without referring to TPO -

Corporate guarantee issued by assessee company in favour of its subsidiary. TPO informed AO that issue regarding computation of ALP of corporate guarantee issued by assessee was not considered by him while finalizing transfer pricing orders. AO proceeded to examine issue of ALP of corporate Guarantee and applied CUP method and determined ALP of guarantee charges. Held: CIT(A) was not justified in holding that AO could himself determine ALP of corporate guarantee under section 92C(3) without making reference to TPO. By not making reference to TPO, AO breached mandatory instructions issued by CBDT.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour

A.Y. : 2008-09


INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 9 Section 40(a)(ia)

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT