The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 2682 (Del-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 92C

Where assessee re-sold good imported from AE to third parties without any value addition RPM was the MAM for determination of ALP.

Transfer pricing - Determination of ALP - Re-sale of imported goods without any value addition - MAM--RPM V. TNMM

Assessee imported surveying instruments from AE abroad for re-sale without any value addition to third party in India. TO benchmark said transaction assessee adopted RPM as the MAM. However, TPO applied TNMM and thus suggested ALP adjustment.Held: Assessee purchased goods from AE and acted as the full fledged distributor and goods purchased from AE had been sold to unrelated parties without any value addition and, therefore, RPM was the MAM for determination of ALP.

Supported by:Matrix Cellular International Services P Ltd. 90 Taxmann.com 54 (Del), Swarovski India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2017) 78 Taxmann.com 325 (Del) : 2017 TaxPub(DT) 1119 (Del-Trib), Mattel Toys India P Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2013) 34 Taxmann.com 203 (Mum) : 2013 TaxPub(DT) 2260 (Mum-Trib), Nokia (India) Pvt. Ltd. ITA No. 242/Del/2010 and Videojet Technologies (I) P Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT, ITA No 6956/Mum/2012.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. : 2014-15



IN THE ITAT, DELHI BENCH

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT