The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 2903 (Mad-HC)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 147

As there was no failure on part of assessee to disclose truly and fully the details and particulars necessary for completing assessment under section 143(3), reopening of assessment beyond a period of four years was not justified.

Reassessment - Validity - Notice issued beyond a period of four years - True and full disclosure by assessee

Assessment in case of assessee-company was completed under section 143(3). Subsequently, the assessment was reopened under section 147 on account of non-disclosure of expenses incurred on cost of construction of building on lease hold building/land. AO alleged that the assessee failed to disclose truly and fully the particulars necessary for completing assessment made under section 143(3). However, Tribunal concluded that the reopening was a change of opinion and hence, would not be sustainable. Held: Assessee filed computation statement along with original assessment, which showed expenditure on construction of building on lease hold land/building and the same was specifically mentioned and claimed as revenue expenditure. Further, the assessment was completed after examining the computation statement and break-up details furnished by the assessee. Thus, after taking into consideration such facts and the fact that the assessment was reopened beyond a period of four years and also after considering the Proviso to section 147, the reopening was one of change of opinion as the assessee made a full disclosure of the expenditure and claimed the same as revenue expenditure. Accordingly, the reopening would not be sustainable.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour

A.Y. :



IN THE MADRAS HIGH COURT

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT