Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED CIT v. Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd. 2018 TaxPub(DT) 5969 (Mad-HC)
REFERRED Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT 2018 TaxPub(DT) 1403 (SC)
REFERRED Dy. CIT (LTU) v. Bosch Ltd. 2017 TaxPub(DT) 4995 (Bang-Trib)
REFERRED Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0968 (SC)
REFERRED Asstt. CIT v. Sanghvi Savla Stock Brokers Ltd. 2015 TaxPub(DT) 1148 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. 2015 TaxPub(DT) 0937 (Mad-HC)
REFERRED Dy. CIT v. Eicher Motors Ltd. 2015 TaxPub(DT) 0491 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Asstt. CIT v. Harper Collins Publishers India Ltd. 2014 TaxPub(DT) 4179 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Gujarat Guardian Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2014 TaxPub(DT) 4067 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. ACL Wireless Ltd. 2014 TaxPub(DT) 1539 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. UHDE India (P.) Ltd. 2013 TaxPub(DT) 2838 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED CIT & Anr. v. IBM India Ltd. 2013 TaxPub(DT) 1945 (Karn-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Technovate E Solutions (P.) Ltd. 2013 TaxPub(DT) 1358 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Dy. CIT v. Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. 2013 TaxPub(DT) 0717 (Asr-Trib)
REFERRED Asstt. CIT v. SRA Systems Ltd. 2013 TaxPub(DT) 0669 (Chen-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Renuga Textiles Mills Ltd. 2013 TaxPub(DT) 0032 (Mad-HC)
REFERRED Asstt. CIT v. SIL Investment Ltd. & Vice Vversa 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2708 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Kotak Securities Ltd. (No. 1) 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2505 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Asstt. CIT v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2489 (Ahd-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Asahi India Safety Glass Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 0765 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Raychem RPG Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 0716 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Maxopp Investment Ltd. & Ors. v. CIT & Ors. 2011 TaxPub(DT) 2171 (Del-HC)
REFERRED St. Microelectronics (P) Ltd. v. CIT(A) 2011 TaxPub(DT) 2155 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. CIT 2011 TaxPub(DT) 0071 (Ker-HC)
REFERRED Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT & Anr. 2010 TaxPub(DT) 2182 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Walfort Share & Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. 2010 TaxPub(DT) 2087 (SC)
REFERRED ITO v. Spice Communications Ltd. 2010 TaxPub(DT) 0865 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Varinder Agro Chemicals Limited 2009 TaxPub(DT) 1000 (P&H-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. G.E. Capital Services Ltd. 2008 TaxPub(DT) 0805 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Southern Roadways Ltd. 2008 TaxPub(DT) 0759 (Mad-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Southern Roadways Ltd. 2007 TaxPub(DT) 0682 (Mad-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Southern Roadways Ltd. 2006 TaxPub(DT) 1240 (Mad-HC)
REFERRED Bank of Punjab Ltd. v. Joint CIT 2004 TaxPub(DT) 0092 (Chd-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. K & Co. 2003 TaxPub(DT) 0699 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Business Information Processing Services v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 2000 TaxPub(DT) 0772 (Jp-Trib)
REFERRED Patel Chemical Works v. Income Tax Officer 2000 TaxPub(DT) 0772 (Ahd-Trib)
REFERRED Alembic Chemical Works Co. Ltd. v. CIT 1989 TaxPub(DT) 1096 (SC)
REFERRED CIT v. Associated Cement Companies Ltd. 1988 TaxPub(DT) 1173 (SC)
REFERRED Empire Jute Co. Ltd. v. CIT 1980 TaxPub(DT) 1083 (SC)
 
The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 3187 (Del-Trib) : (2021) 186 ITD 0353

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 37(1)

No ownership of any software was acquired by the assessee as a consequence of ERP expenditure. Assessee has only limited right to use concerned software product which assessee acquired without acquiring right of transferring the software. Accordingly, no benefit of an enduring nature had been derived by assessee as result of concerned expenditure and, therefore, it could not be held as of capital in nature.

Capital or revenue expenditure - ERP and software related expenses - On implementation of new ERP package -

Assessee claimed deduction of ERP and software related expenses incurred on implementation of new ERP package. AO treated the same as of capital in nature and thus disallowed deduction.Held: No ownership of any software was acquired by the assessee as a consequence of ERP expenditure. Assessee has only limited right to use concerned software product which assessee acquired without acquiring right of transferring the software. AO ignored the fact that in today's fast changing technology where software becomes absolete for smooth functioning of business, software needs to be replaced/upgraded by an assessee from time-to-time. Accordingly, no benefit of an enduring nature had been derived by assessee as result of concerned expenditure and, therefore, it could not be held as of capital in nature.

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assedssee's favour.

A.Y. : 2001-02 to 2005-06


INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 14A

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT