Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED Block Development Officer v. ACIT 2020 TaxPub(DT) 2594 (Jp-Trib)
REFERRED Qatalys Software Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. UOI 2020 TaxPub(DT) 1618 (Mad-HC)
REFERRED Ajvin Infotech (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2020 TaxPub(DT) 1499 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED DD Motors v. DCIT 2019 TaxPub(DT) 7822 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Prakash Industries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2019 TaxPub(DT) 6422 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Biswajit Das v. UOI & Ors. 2019 TaxPub(DT) 0731 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Rajesh Kourani v. UOI 2017 TaxPub(DT) 1953 (Guj-HC)
REFERRED Vidya Vardhani Education and Research Foundation v. Dy. CIT 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0708 (Pune-Trib)
REFERRED Sree Narayana Guru Smaraka Sangam Upper Primary School v. UOI 2017 TaxPub(DT) 0212 (Ker-HC)
REFERRED Maharashtra Cricket Association v. Dy. CIT 2016 TaxPub(DT) 4322 (Pune-Trib)
REFERRED Fatheraj Singhvi v. Union of India 2016 TaxPub(DT) 4175 (Karn-HC)
REFERRED Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan v. UOI 2015 TaxPub(DT) 5497 (Raj-HC)
REFERRED Dr. Amrit Lal Mangal v. UOI 2015 TaxPub(DT) 5329 (P&H-HC)
REFERRED Lakshminirman Bangalore (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2015 TaxPub(DT) 3296 (Karn-HC)
REFERRED Rashmikant Kundalia & Anr. v. UOI & Ors. 2015 TaxPub(DT) 0514 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Meeraj Estate & Developers v. Dy. CIT 2014 TaxPub(DT) 2039 (Agra-Trib)
REFERRED Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2636 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Rohitasava Chand v. CIT 2008 TaxPub(DT) 1800 (Del-HC)
REFERRED K.K. Khullar v. Dy. CIT 2008 TaxPub(DT) 1484 (Del-Trib)
REFERRED Remfry & Sons v. CIT 2005 TaxPub(DT) 1456 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT 1992 TaxPub(DT) 0858 (SC)
REFERRED CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd. 1973 TaxPub(DT) 0421 (SC)
REFERRED Dwarkadas Kesardeo Morarka v. CIT 1962 TaxPub(DT) 0063 (SC)
 
The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 3548 (Del-Trib)

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 234E Section 260A

Notices issued under section 200A for computation and intimation in payment of late filing fee under section 234E relating to the period of tax deduction prior to 1-6-2015 were not maintainable, though late fee was actually levied after 1-6-2015 because amendments brought in statute with effect from 1-6-2015 are prospective in nature.

Fees under section 234E - Delay in filing of TDS statements leviability - Default pertaining to period prior to 1-6-2015 though fee levied after 1-6-2015 -

Assessee challenged late fee charged by AO under section 234E in respect of delayed filing of TDS statements pertaining to the period prior to 1-6-2015. Revenue's case was that since AO levied late filing fee under section 234E only after 1-6-2015 the claim of assessee for exemption from levy of late filing fee was liable to be dismissed.Held: Amendments brought in statute with effect from 1-6-2015 are prospective in nature and hence notices issued under section 200A for computation and intimation in payment of late filing fee under section 234E relating to the period of tax deduction prior to 1-6-2015 were not maintainable, though late fee was actually levied after 1-6-2015.

Followed:Fatehraj Singhvi v. UOI, Prakash Industries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT ITA Nos. 5865 to 5869/Del/2016, Order, dated 29-7-2019 : 2019 TaxPub(DT) 6422 (Del-Trib), Ajvin Infotech Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT ITA No. 2305 & 2306/Del/2017, Order, dated 4-3-2020 : 2020 TaxPub(DT) 1499 (Del-Trib), D.D. Motors, Haryana v. Dy. CIT ITA No. 956/Del/2017, Order, dated 18-10-2019 : 2019 TaxPub(DT) 7822 (Del-Trib) and District Health & Welfare Society v. ITO, ITA No. 7473/Del/2018, Order, dated 26-4-2019. Relied:Vegetables Products Limited (1973) 88 ITR 192 (SC).

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. :



IN THE ITAT, DELHI BENCH

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT