IN THE ITAT, DELHI BENCH
R.K. PANDA, A.M. & SUCHITRA KAMBLE, J.M.
Mitsui & Co. Ltd. v. DDIT
ITA No. 4377/Del/2016
22 September, 2020
Assessee by: Ved Jain Sr. Advocate, Ashish Goel, CA
Department by: Satpal Gulati, Commissioner
R.K. Panda, A.M.
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the Order, dated 29-5-2015 of the learned Commissioner (Appeals)-43, New Delhi relating to assessment year 2010-11
2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a company incorporated in Japan and is one of biggest trading houses of the world. The assessee is involved in trading from needle to airplane engines. Assessee also undertakes several projects in connection with big industrial installations power projects.
3. It filed its return of income on 15-10-2010 declaring income of Rs. 2,87,80,329. The assessing officer during the course of assessment proceedings noted that the assessee has received consideration for executing two projects, namely, Teesta & Purulia Projects. The assessee has entered into contracts with National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. (NHPC) on 6-12-2001 for carrying out Electrical and mechanical Works of Teesta H.E. Project (3 X 1 70 MW (Stage-V) Sikkim, India). These agreements are--
(a) First Contract--For CIF/CIP Supply of all offshore equipments and materials including Mandatory Spares for Lot-6 Electrical & Mechanical works of Teesta HE Project (Stage-V).