Case Laws Analysis
REFERRED Satish S. Prabhu v. Asstt. CIT 2019 TaxPub(DT) 8327 (Mum-Trib)
REFERRED DCIT (E) v. Indore Education & Service Society 2019 TaxPub(DT) 7683 (Ind-Trib)
REFERRED Jt. CIT v. CRM JAT Post Graduate College 2019 TaxPub(DT) 5048 (Chd-Trib)
REFERRED Gurmeet Singh Vilkhu v. Pr. CIT 2019 TaxPub(DT) 1752 (MP-HC)
REFERRED Dy. CIT v. Zydus Wellness Ltd. 2016 TaxPub(DT) 5185 (Ahd-Trib)
REFERRED CIT v. Jat Education Society 2015 TaxPub(DT) 5455 (P&H-HC)
REFERRED M.P. Rajya Open School v. Dy. CIT 2014 TaxPub(DT) 2066 (Ind-Trib)
REFERRED Dy. DIT(E) v. Petroleum Sports Promotion Board 2014 TaxPub(DT) 1216 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Pruthvi Brokers & Shareholders Pvt. Ltd. 2012 TaxPub(DT) 2671 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Tata Yadogawa Ltd. v. CIT 2011 TaxPub(DT) 0497 (Jhar-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Indian Institute of Management 2011 TaxPub(DT) 0424 (Karn-HC)
REFERRED Marlborough Polychem Ltd. v. CIT 2010 TaxPub(DT) 0064 (Raj-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Khalsa Dewan (Regd.) 2008 TaxPub(DT) 1553 (P&H-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Mcdowell & Co. Ltd. 2006 TaxPub(DT) 1707 (Karn-HC)
REFERRED Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT 2006 TaxPub(DT) 1528 (SC)
REFERRED CIT v. Kay Kay Family Trust 2005 TaxPub(DT) 1539 (All-HC)
REFERRED Samtel Color Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. 2002 TaxPub(DT) 1619 (Del-HC)
REFERRED CIT v. Orbit Travel and Tours (P) Ltd. 1999 TaxPub(DT) 1201 (AP-HC)
REFERRED Parikh Engineering & Body Building Co. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. 1999 TaxPub(DT) 0872 (Pat-HC)
REFERRED Makum Tea Co. (India) Ltd. v. Deputy CIT & Anr. 1999 TaxPub(DT) 0832 (Gau-HC)
REFERRED God Granites v. Central Board of Direct Taxes & Ors. 1996 TaxPub(DT) 0459 (Karn-HC)
REFERRED Tanna Exports & Anr. v. M.G. Kamat, Assistant CIT & Anr. 1993 TaxPub(DT) 0594 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Indian Rayon and Industries Ltd. & Anr. v. J.R. Kanekar, Assistant CIT & Anr. 1993 TaxPub(DT) 0593 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Bank of America N.T. & S.A. v. Deputy CIT & Anr. 1993 TaxPub(DT) 0591 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Adamas Gem Industries Ltd. & Anr. v. Smt. Neela Krishnan, Assistant CIT & Anr. 1993 TaxPub(DT) 0589 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Mahalakshmi Glass Works Ltd. & Anr. v. Sunil Gupta, Assistant CIT & Anr. 1993 TaxPub(DT) 0588 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Jks Employees Welfare Fund v. Income Tax Officer 1993 TaxPub(DT) 0399 (Raj-HC)
REFERRED Khatau Junkar Ltd. & Anr. v. K.S. Pathania, Deputy CIT & Anr. 1992 TaxPub(DT) 1102 (Bom-HC)
REFERRED Srf Charitable Trust v. Union of India & Ors. 1992 TaxPub(DT) 0824 (Del-HC)
REFERRED Om Trading Co. & Ors. v. Second Income Tax Officer 1991 TaxPub(DT) 0974 (Karn-HC)
REFERRED Kamal Textiles v. Income Tax Officer & Ors. 1991 TaxPub(DT) 0953 (MP-HC)
REFERRED Madan Gopal Bagla v. CIT 1956 TaxPub(DT) 0169 (SC)
 
The Tax Publishers2020 TaxPub(DT) 4768 (Ind-Trib) : (2021) 186 ITD 0378

INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 10(23C)(iiiab)

Before insertion of Explanation to clause 10(23C)(iiiab) with effect from 1-4-2015 setting out minimum threshold of 50% financing by government even institutions receiving substantial grant less than 50% of total contribution by government could also be held to be eligible for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab). In assessee's case government grant was 49.4%, though not exact 50% of the total receipt and it was substantial looking at the quantum of contribution as well as control of State Government in the functioning of assessee-society as well as movement of funds. Therefore, assessee was eligible for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab).

Exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) - Allowability - Grants received from govt. being less than 50% of total receipts -

Assessee, an educational institute, claimed exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab). Revenue denied assessee's claim on the ground that assessee had not been substantially financed by the government during the year and grants received from govt. were less than 50 of total receipts of the year. Held: Before insertion of Explanation to clause 10(23)(iiiab) with effect from 1-4-2015 setting out minimum threshold of 50% financing by government's even institutions receiving substantial grant less than 50% of total contribution by government could also be held to be eligible for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab). In assessee's case government grant was 49.4% though not exact 50% of the total receipt of fee and grant during the year. Undoubtedly government grant was substantial looking at the quantum of contribution as well as control of State Government in the functioning of assessee society as well as movement of funds. Therefore, assessee was eligible for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab), since it was established with the sole object to run for educational purposes, and not for the purpose of profits.

Followed:CRM Jat Post Graduate College Indian Institute of Management

REFERRED :

FAVOUR : In assessee's favour.

A.Y. : 2014-15


INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Section 143(3), 56

SUBSCRIBE TaxPublishers.inSUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT