Dhairyasheel Pralhad Pawar v. DCIT

SUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT


The Tax Publishers2023 TaxPub(DT) 1112 (Pune-Trib) IN THE ITAT PUNE A BENCH R.S.SYAL, V.P. & PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, J.M. Dhairyasheel Pralhad Pawar v. DCIT ITA No(s). 950/PUN/2022 to 955/PUN/2022 14 February 2023 Assessee by: Kishor B. Phadke Revenue by: Ramesh P. Murkunde ORDER *Per Bench* This batch of 6 appeals arise from different orders passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi on 28-10-2022 dismissing all the appeals at the threshold on account of delay in filing the appeals ranging from minimum of 2627 days to maximum of 2849 days. The issue raised in all these appeals is charging of interest under section.234E for the quarters arising in assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15. 2. At the outset, the learned Authorised Representative submitted that the appeal in ITA No.955/PUN/2022 was wrongly filed in duplicate. The learned Departmental Representative vouched for the contention. In view of the factual scenario, we dismiss the appeal in ITA No.955/PUN/2022 as having been filed in duplicate. SUBSCRIBE FOR FULL CONTENT

The Tax Publishers2023 TaxPub(DT) 1112 (Pune-Trib)

IN THE ITAT PUNE A BENCH

R.S.SYAL, V.P. & PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, J.M.

Dhairyasheel Pralhad Pawar v. DCIT

ITA No(s). 950/PUN/2022 to 955/PUN/2022

14 February 2023

Assessee by: Kishor B. Phadke

Revenue by: Ramesh P. Murkunde

ORDER

Per Bench

This batch of 6 appeals arise from different orders passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi on 28-10-2022 dismissing all the appeals at the threshold on account of delay in filing the appeals ranging from minimum of 2627 days to maximum of 2849 days. The issue raised in all these appeals is charging of interest under section.234E for the quarters arising in assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15.

2. At the outset, the learned Authorised Representative submitted that the appeal in ITA No.955/PUN/2022 was wrongly filed in duplicate. The learned Departmental Representative vouched for the contention. In view of the factual scenario, we dismiss the appeal in ITA No.955/PUN/2022 as having been filed in duplicate.